A: Reflective Commentary
In the beginning, I was asked: “What is Art?”. Looking back on my answer to that, I would say that my views haven’t changed; I’d say it has progressed more. Art has a purpose, that’s what makes it art and the audience completes the piece with their opinions. The context is also important these days with art changing so much. I believe it’s rather easy to identify art if it has some context with it, however, coming across a piece of work with very little context can be challenging to understand.
These past couple of months completing the first project has been a challenge. It took some time getting back into the studying routine after being away from it for a year. I need to work on my time management as I can get easily sidetracked. However, I’ve become more motivated to study as I’m enjoying the projects. I have been using the Pomodoro technique when doing my studying as it helps me to focus and go back to it with a fresh mind. One of the study skills I feel I have developed is planning for essay writing. Before, I used to try and go straight into it whereas now I write out a plan with separate bullet points for each paragraph to ensure my work is well-constructed and produced efficiently.
I chose to use a learning log as a way to exhibit my research, coursework, and assignments but I also chose this because I’m familiar with using a blog due to using Blogger in school. I feel I’ve always got carried away with the writing side of things and forgot to add the visual elements. I can improve this by attaching photos, videos, drawings, and notes to make my posts look more visually exciting.
I did quite a bit of contemporary art in school that was also familiar to me. The first project was fairly easy, looking at the context discovering the true meaning of art, etc. The second project was very interesting. I loved doing the case study about the Longplayer, it was so fascinating and so many beautiful sounds. However, I felt I struggled a little bit with explaining the positioning of bowls and spectators, etc within the analysis. I also enjoyed doing the case study about Nathan Coley’s piece. I believe I could have put more effort into doing further research to gain full knowledge but as I said before time management isn’t my thing and this is something I need to work on.
Word Count: 419
B: Jeremy Deller’s ‘The Battle of Orgreave’
In this essay, I am going to discuss my interpretation of ‘The Battle of Orgreave’, a re-enactment by Jeremy Deller that took place in Yorkshire 2001. I will consider the form and the context within this piece, but also the relation it has to time and place.
When I first watched the documentary, I felt slightly shocked. I was surprised at how real it felt when watching it. It had many factors that helped to engage the viewer and take them back to 1984. It portrays feelings of rage and fury but also vulnerability for the miners as they take a beating from the police. On the other hand, I thought of the people that were at the 1984 clash and how they would have responded to the re-enactment. Would they have felt offended by it or seen it as a tribute to what happened that day?
The Battle of Orgreave was a horrific confrontation between the police and miners at Orgreave on 18th July 1984. The most violent clash in history. This happened because the National Union of Mineworkers went on a yearlong strike. Jeremy Deller staged a re-enactment 17 years later to educate the viewers on this tragic event. But for the locals, it was an event they had to emotionally experience all over again in a different form. “I’ve always described it as digging up a corpse and giving it a proper post-mortem,” said Deller (The Battle of Orgreave, 2001). His piece is built up of 3 sectors that all have contributing factors to the event; the actual re-enactment, the film, and the installation.
The re-enactment that took 2 years of research and planning consisted of more than 800 participants, 200 of which were former police and miners that Deller encouraged to take part in. There were 80’s denim jackets worn by the miners and the police wore their uniform. By including these, Deller has created a sense of realism for the audience, but he’s also created feelings of anger for those re-living the event. The re-enactment effectively addresses the viewer directly through live performance.
The film was directed by Mike Figgis for Artangel Media and Channel 4. It includes shots from a variety of angles, from police hitting miners with truncheons to miners trying to avoid the cruelty. This emphasizes the brutality of violence that took place. Still shots from the proper event in 1984 flash over the 2001 re-enactment. We hear the sounds of pictures being taken, interviews from victims sharing their perspective and how it impacted their lives. Seeing how emotional some of the victims are, implied that they never intended for a war to break out, but it did and they fought, “It was not simply jobs that were being fought for here, but also local identity and the importance of place to our continued sense of self” (Dean and Millar, 2005;106). All these elements enhance the significance and engage the viewer as if they were involved. It makes you feel sympathy for the men that work hard for the nation.
The footage has features that resemble a historic battle such as the continuous bangs of the drum connote soldiers preparing for war. Charging towards fleeing pickets, the cavalry and the sounds they make help to implicate a battle. The title itself puts a stamp on the violent confrontation. The term ‘battle’ instantly makes the viewers think of the major conflict between armed forces such as The Battle of Hastings. By giving it this title, it produces real emphasis on the significance of this event.
Whilst the film effectively incorporates these features together; the installation at Tate aids the audience with social and political context through the use of documents, maps, riot shields, videos and audio files from the event. The title of the installation is ‘The Battle of Orgreave Archive: An Injury to One is an Injury to All’. That slogan is used by the people of the Industrial Union, implying everyone is equal regardless of their trade, skills, gender or race. I believe this slogan is very fitting for The Battle of Orgreave as it wasn’t just those involved that it affected.
There are references to place within this piece. Firstly, it is site-specific. I think the location of the re-enactment was important it had to be staged in the same place as the 1984 clash to ensure it was an accurate remembrance rather than a mockery. The piece also has references to the theme of time as Deller held the re-enactment at the same time as the original event, 17th June but 17 years later in the same village. The effect of these dates and location being the same is almost like creating a time machine for those participating and those spectating. Every last bit of detail had to be correct for it to be successful and I think Deller had done a great job. It allowed the veterans to be transported back in time to this life-changing event.
Many of Jeremy Deller’s other works have political and social connections, “The History of the World” 1997 is another piece by Deller that includes brief information about Britain and how some things have changed over the years. It has links to the miners’ strike, implicating civil unrest at Orgreave. There are other links to privatization and deindustrialization, this piece demonstrates a thought process that could have potentially helped to influence ‘The Battle of Orgreave’ re-enactment. Deller has a fascination with ‘living history’, a term he uses to denote his representation of historical events. He discusses his fascination and suggests that his works like ‘The Battle of Orgreave’ 2001, ‘It Is What It Is’ 2009 and ‘We’re Here Because We’re Here’ 2016 are “public inquiries, creating ‘living memorials for the dead'”. (HeniTalks, 2017). He gives participants and spectators a sense of stepping back in time through his re-enactments.
To conclude, I strongly believe Jeremy Deller created this piece not to influence but to educate viewers and help them to understand. “I was not interested in a nostalgic interpretation of the strike” (The English Civil War: Part II, 2002). He intended to represent that specific time in history that changed the conduct of industrial relations and I believe that he has done this successfully through the context of his works in ‘The Battle of Orgreave’.
Word Count: 1051
Bibliography:
Jeremy Deller – ‘ The Battle of Orgreave’ (2001). At: www.jeremydeller.org/TheBattleOfOrgreave/TheBattleOfOrgreave_Video.php [accessed 05/05/19]
Tate Installation (2001) An Injury To One Is An Injury To All. At: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/deller-the-battle-of-orgreave-archive-an-injury-to-one-is-an- injury-to-all-t12185 [accessed 07/07/19]
Artangel (2001). At: https://www.artangel.org.uk/project/the-battle-of-orgreave [accessed 10/07/19
Faquharson, A. (2001). The Battle of Orgreave. At: https://www.frieze.com/article/jeremy-deller [accessed 10/07/19]
Jones, J. (2001) Missiles fly, truncheons swing, police chase miners as cars burn. It’s all very exciting. But why is it art? At: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/jun/19/artsfeatures [accessed 11/05/19]
Apollo Magazine (2014) The Battle of Orgreave and ‘The Battle of Orgreave’. At: https://www.apollo-magazine.com/battle-of-orgreave-battle-orgreave [accessed 12/05/19]
Heni Talks (2017) Jeremy Deller: ‘It Is What It Is’. At: https://henitalks.com/talks/jeremy-deller/#transcript [accessed 14/09/19]