For this exercise, I wanted to focus on observing and capturing the unique qualities of artificial light rather than just using it to light up a subject. I wanted to pay attention to the mood the light created, not just whether the image was correctly exposed.
Neon Light
The first set of images was taken indoors using a rainbow neon light in a bedroom. I noticed how the light didn’t just brighten the room but actually altered the atmosphere, adding color, shape, and softness to the space. In the first image, the light was casting a strong glow onto the nearby wall, spreading the colored light and creating a soft, ambient effect. The light looked less like a direct source and more like a color wash across the room. The settings were 1/250 sec, f/4.5, ISO 800. The exposure allowed for a balanced shot that captured the glow, but the light appeared more diffused and soft, with the reflection playing just as big a role as the light source itself.
For the second image, I changed the shutter speed to 1/1000 sec while keeping the aperture and ISO the same. This adjustment reduced the light captured from the surroundings, making the neon sign itself appear much bolder, sharper, and more defined. The settings were 1/1000 sec, f/4.5, ISO 800. The glow on the wall was almost entirely lost in this shot, and the light became the main focus of the composition. I liked how this created a more graphic, contrast-heavy look compared to the softer atmosphere in the first photo. It also reminded me of the difference between ambient light and direct light in studio setups, even though this was a bedroom scene.


Computer Screen Light
The next two photos I took were of a computer screen in a room. I found this setup interesting because the computer acts as both the subject and the light source.
In the first image, I adjusted the camera settings to 1/100 sec, f/5, ISO 800 until the exposure looked balanced to my eye. The result was a fairly accurate representation of how the scene looked. The screen wasn’t overly bright, and the room was just dark enough to give the photo a sense of contrast.
For the second image, I deliberately adjusted my settings, so the exposure meter was set at 0, which required lowering the shutter speed to 1/60. This change brightened the overall image, especially the room around the screen, and reduced the intensity of the screen glow, making the environment more visible. It was a simple but useful demonstration of how adjusting to the meter’s “perfect exposure” isn’t always the most atmospheric choice. Sometimes slightly underexposing gives the scene a more natural or dramatic look.


Bedroom Lamp Light
Next, I photographed a lamp in a dark bedroom, which gave me a chance to see how artificial light changes the mood depending on exposure choices.
In the first shot, I set my camera to 1/200 sec, f/4.5, ISO 1600. I kept the exposure meter at 0 by using a high ISO and moderate shutter speed. This gave me an evenly lit scene, where the lamp’s light filled the room and softened the shadows.
For the second shot, I set it to 1/250 sec, f/4.5, ISO 800. I wanted the light to feel more moody and intimate, so I adjusted the settings to darken the exposure. I reduced the ISO and used a slightly faster shutter speed, which kept the lamp’s glow more contained and the rest of the room dimmer.
This comparison showed me how important intention is when shooting with artificial light. It isn’t just about making sure a photo is properly exposed but about using exposure to shape the feeling of the scene.


Street Light & Car Headlights
After experimenting indoors, I moved outside after dark to capture the effect of streetlights and passing car headlights.
In my first outdoor image, I used the settings ISO 6400, f/8, 1/20s. My goal wasn’t to photograph the light source itself, but rather to show the way the artificial light shaped and illuminated the space creating an orange glow throughout. This light felt very different from the sharp, direct rays of sunlight; it was more localized and atmospheric.
For the next two shots, I experimented with slow shutter speeds to introduce movement and play with the exposure of the scene. I set the shutter to 1/4s and kept the ISO at 6400 to compensate for the low light. The first image came out too bright with an aperture of f/14, so I adjusted the aperture to f/20 for the next shot, which created a better balance and allowed the glow from the streetlights and the streaks of car headlights to be more visible without overexposing the scene.



Reflection
Comparing these artificial light shots to the daylight images I captured in Exercise 4.1, the differences are striking. Daylight typically produces a more natural and evenly distributed light, whereas artificial light often creates strong contrasts, defined edges, and a particular mood or atmosphere.
Artificial sources like neon, lamps, and streetlights introduce a wide range of color temperatures, which can create mixed and sometimes conflicting tones within the same frame. I found this especially interesting when car headlights and streetlights interacted in the same shot. The cool white light of the headlights contrasted against the warm orange glow of the streetlamps, creating a layered and dynamic composition.
Using artificial light, I felt like I had more creative freedom to manipulate the mood of the scene, especially by adjusting shutter speed and aperture to control exposure and the way light shaped the space.
One thing I learned during this exercise is how much potential there is for creative experimentation with slow shutter speeds. While I was happy with the balance I achieved at 1/4s, in future shoots I’d like to slow the shutter even more to capture more defined and fluid light trails. Especially with moving light sources like car headlights. I think this could help add a stronger sense of motion and energy to my night photography.







































